This essay explores questions regarding the paradoxical nature of glass as a material that escapes (or exceeds) disciplinary expectations. These questions arose from a workshop led by Isobel Armstrong on ‘Working with Glass', in which delegates to Birkbeck's ‘The Verbal and the Visual' conference discussed a selection of mid-nineteenth-century glass-factory tourist narratives. They are filled with rich visual description, yet failures of description – evasions, hesitancies, deferrals and silences - abound. Glass, the antithetical material, produces a paradoxical mode of description in which the collapse of ekphrasis is as significant as its articulation.
How to Cite:
Inglis K., (2007) “Working with Glass: Strategies of Representation in Mid-Nineteenth Century Glass Factory Tourist Narratives”, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 0(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.464